msgbartop
Social media analytics for decision-making
msgbarbottom

11 Jan 09 Most-cited sources on Twitter: frequency v. reach

I have extracted domain names from the URLs that I track on Twitter. Below is a table that shows how many citations and how many unique citing users there are for the top 25 domains since midnight last night.  The numbers are quite different.  For example, Engadget and Digg are cited quite a bit – high frequency – but by relatively few people – low reach. ReadWriteWeb, Mashable and TechCrunch seem to do the best job of achieving frequency and reach.

Here are the top 25 ordered by the number of people who cited pages from each source.

domain cites users
www.readwriteweb.com 263 216
mashable.com 210 189
www.techcrunch.com 274 162
news.cnet.com 236 118
friendfeed.com 164 98
www.whoppersacrifice.com 78 78
www.youtube.com 94 74
lifehacker.com 152 72
sethgodin.typepad.com 77 71
twitpic.com 115 69
twitter.com 114 69
www.smashingmagazine.com 76 68
digg.com 490 65
www.cnn.com 106 63
www.microsoft.com 59 59
www.ustream.tv 57 57
news.bbc.co.uk 102 53
truemors.nowpublic.com 78 52
danzarrella.com 50 50
www.google.com 52 48
www10.nytimes.com 82 47
xr.com 47 47
museums.alltop.com 47 47
www.engadget.com 534 45
www.mobilecrunch.com 48 40

Here are the top 25 sorted by number of cites.

domain cites users
www.engadget.com 534 45
digg.com 490 65
www.techcrunch.com 274 162
www.readwriteweb.com 263 216
news.cnet.com 236 118
mashable.com 210 189
www.techmeme.com 190 24
friendfeed.com 164 98
lifehacker.com 152 72
twitpic.com 115 69
twitter.com 114 69
www.cnn.com 106 63
news.bbc.co.uk 102 53
www.youtube.com 94 74
www10.nytimes.com 82 47
truemors.nowpublic.com 78 52
www.whoppersacrifice.com 78 78
sethgodin.typepad.com 77 71
www.smashingmagazine.com 76 68
twitrss.dyndns.org 63 4
www.msnbc.msn.com 61 26
www.microsoft.com 59 59
www.ustream.tv 57 57
news.yahoo.com 54 30
www.google.com 52 48

  • This is interesting and good information. To complete this, it would be good to show the number of follower each user has. You could have a cite that has a small number of users but a much larger follower count.
blog comments powered by Disqus