<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter:  Massively parallel self-organizing points of view</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nickarnett.net/2008/12/31/twitter-massively-parallel-self-organization-of-points-of-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nickarnett.net/2008/12/31/twitter-massively-parallel-self-organization-of-points-of-view/</link>
	<description>Social media analytics for decision-making</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:53:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.nickarnett.net/2008/12/31/twitter-massively-parallel-self-organization-of-points-of-view/comment-page-1/#comment-588</link>
		<dc:creator>dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickarnett.net/?p=110#comment-588</guid>
		<description>Great article. 

One question so: You say: &quot;(internet) it is self-organizing, so there is no equivalent of a member of Congress&quot;

I&#039;m not sure.

You&#039;ve got influencers in different communities. 

As elected officials got our vote and sometimes trust , these guys got your  clicks and views and sometimes trust :-).

R Scoble is a member of the Social media  Congress, so as Chris Brogan ... (we&#039;ve published a list of the top 150 here: http://blog.ecairn.com/2009/02/09/top-150-social-media-marketing-blogs/ )

The parallel goes even into the $. As candidates throw  a lot of $ in their campaign, top influencers throw  lots of $ in their ad campaigns, SEO/SEM effort,  even staff people to write content for them.

So it&#039;s not one man one vote or one blog one vote or one tweet one vote.

Best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. </p>
<p>One question so: You say: &#8220;(internet) it is self-organizing, so there is no equivalent of a member of Congress&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve got influencers in different communities. </p>
<p>As elected officials got our vote and sometimes trust , these guys got your  clicks and views and sometimes trust <img src='http://www.nickarnett.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>R Scoble is a member of the Social media  Congress, so as Chris Brogan &#8230; (we&#8217;ve published a list of the top 150 here: <a href="http://blog.ecairn.com/2009/02/09/top-150-social-media-marketing-blogs/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.ecairn.com/2009/02/09/top-150-social-media-marketing-blogs/</a> )</p>
<p>The parallel goes even into the $. As candidates throw  a lot of $ in their campaign, top influencers throw  lots of $ in their ad campaigns, SEO/SEM effort,  even staff people to write content for them.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s not one man one vote or one blog one vote or one tweet one vote.</p>
<p>Best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter social network leaders: navel-gazing or more? &#124; Measuring Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.nickarnett.net/2008/12/31/twitter-massively-parallel-self-organization-of-points-of-view/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter social network leaders: navel-gazing or more? &#124; Measuring Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickarnett.net/?p=110#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] of the service&#8217;s most powerful uses.  As I have written, I&#8217;m looking at Twitter as a massively parallel self-organizing point-of-view system.  In other words, my premise it that by posting URLs to Twitter, people are saying that they found [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the service&#8217;s most powerful uses.  As I have written, I&#8217;m looking at Twitter as a massively parallel self-organizing point-of-view system.  In other words, my premise it that by posting URLs to Twitter, people are saying that they found [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisamurphyTO (lisamurphyTO)</title>
		<link>http://www.nickarnett.net/2008/12/31/twitter-massively-parallel-self-organization-of-points-of-view/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>lisamurphyTO (lisamurphyTO)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nickarnett.net/?p=110#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Good points. RT &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/cheeky&quot;&gt;@cheeky&lt;/a&gt;_geeky &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/nick&quot;&gt;@nick&lt;/a&gt;_arnett Twitter helps me learn things that interest people who I think are interesting http://is.gd/euyb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. RT <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/cheeky">@cheeky</a>_geeky <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/nick">@nick</a>_arnett Twitter helps me learn things that interest people who I think are interesting <a href="http://is.gd/euyb" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/euyb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
